We help Albuquerque building owners write roofing scopes detailed enough to run honest multi-contractor bid processes — then submit our own bid on equal footing with every other contractor.
We help Albuquerque asset owners write roofing scopes detailed enough to run honest multi-contractor bid processes — then we submit our own bid on equal footing with everyone else.
Most commercial roofing bids in the Albuquerque metro fail as competitive processes before the first contractor shows up. The scope is written too loosely. One contractor specifies 60-mil TPO on mechanically attached plates; another quotes fully adhered 80-mil PVC. One prices a 20-year no-dollar-limit warranty path; another does not include manufacturer warranty coordination at all. The building owner receives three numbers with no way to determine whether they represent the same project. In New Mexico's public sector, the problem carries additional legal weight: state agency, Bernalillo County, and University of New Mexico procurements governed by the New Mexico Procurement Code, NMSA 1978 Sections 13-1-1 through 13-1-199, require a documented basis for scope equivalency. A thin scope document is a procurement-integrity risk, not just a comparison problem.
We help owners resolve this before the bid goes out. When an owner wants to run a competitive process — whether to satisfy the NM Procurement Code on public facilities, to meet Bernalillo County purchasing policy, to satisfy a lender or board requirement, or simply because the project scale warrants it — we write the scope document that levels the playing field. Every bidder prices the same membrane thickness, attachment method, insulation stack, flashing specification, and warranty path. The bid tab becomes an apples-to-apples comparison that a procurement officer or auditor can review without question.
We then participate as one of the bidders. We do not charge for scope-writing as a condition of winning the work. If you select a different contractor on price or relationship, we have done the work anyway because a credible process protects our standing in the Albuquerque owner community. Owners know we are not running a scope-writing engagement as a back-door route to sole-source work.
A bid-ready roofing scope for an Albuquerque commercial building specifies at minimum: membrane product line and thickness (60-mil vs. 80-mil TPO; 60-mil EPDM; 50-mil or 60-mil PVC), attachment method and fastener pattern density designed against New Mexico's ASCE 7 wind-uplift zone for the specific building exposure category, insulation specification (polyiso R-value to current IECC minimums with elevation-adjusted thermal performance documentation, cover board type, tapered package where the drain array requires it), flashing details at all penetrations, drains, parapets, and curbs by reference to the specified manufacturer's published detail library, warranty path (15-year vs. 20-year vs. 25-year NDL with or without manufacturer-funded labor), and closeout documentation requirements including photo log, roof zone diagram, warranty registration, and maintenance contract.
Scopes that leave these items open create the bid spread that makes competitive processes meaningless. A single membrane thickness change from 60-mil to 80-mil shifts installed cost roughly $0.40 to $0.60 per square foot on a large roof — a gap that has nothing to do with contractor quality or efficiency. On University of New Mexico or state agency projects subject to the NM Procurement Code, an underdefined scope creates post-award protest exposure when losing bidders can demonstrate that the comparison was not equivalent.
We also draft the bid form — the table structure that requires all bidders to break out labor, material, warranty, and closeout costs as separate line items. This alone surfaces apples-to-oranges gaps that a lump-sum bid format conceals entirely, and it produces the line-item documentation that NM Procurement Code audits expect.
Once the scope document is issued to all bidders, we submit our own bid on identical terms. We do not review other contractors' bids before finalizing ours. We do not receive first-right-of-refusal or last-look pricing. The bid process is the bid process, and we do not occupy a position in it that other bidders do not also occupy.
Where we are often useful after bids come back: reference-checking on contractors the owner does not know. The Albuquerque commercial roofing market includes a core of established local contractors with long track records, a rotating group of contractors who arrive from Phoenix or Denver after a significant hailstorm or monsoon event and leave when the market normalizes, and a category of out-of-state contractors who pursue Kirtland AFB adjacent or Department of Energy contractor facility work without strong local presence. We can tell owners which contractors in the bid pool have closed out projects with functioning manufacturer warranties, which ones have had warranty-inspection failures and how they handled them, and which ones are genuinely equipped to execute a large Albuquerque project through the monsoon season under same-day dry-in discipline.
Projects above roughly $400,000 in installed value almost always benefit from a formal competitive scope process. Below that threshold, the scope-writing overhead can exceed the savings from bid competition. For smaller projects, an informal telephone reference check and a written scope the owner drafts with our input often produces the same outcome with less overhead.
Board-governed properties, public institutions, and portfolios with formal procurement policies often require documented competitive processes regardless of project size. This includes UNM facilities (governed by New Mexico Board of Regents purchasing policy and the NM Procurement Code), Bernalillo County-owned buildings, City of Albuquerque Development Services-permitted projects over the public bid threshold, and Sandia National Laboratories contractor-support facilities with DOE procurement compliance requirements. We format scope documentation to satisfy an auditor or procurement officer as well as a contractor — the same document serves both functions.
No. We write the scope as part of our business development process. If the process results in another contractor winning the project, we have built a relationship with a building owner who ran a credible process and knows we participated honestly. Over time, that is worth more to us than a single project fee. Owners also tend to return when they have future projects.
We specify by performance requirement wherever possible — minimum membrane thickness, minimum R-value, minimum wind-uplift rating, warranty term — rather than by manufacturer name. When a manufacturer must be named for warranty inspection eligibility purposes, we list all qualified manufacturers that
Yes. Some owners use the scope-writing process to produce a specification they then use in owner-direct negotiations with a single contractor. The scope document belongs to you. We retain no intellectual property interest in a roofing scope we produce for your building.
Yes. Procurements subject to NMSA 13-1-1 require documented basis for specification equivalency, and the scope document we write for a state or Bernalillo County project is formatted to support that documentation requirement. We build the equivalency rationale into the spec so the procurement officer has what an audit or protest review would need.
We will walk the roof, write the scope document to competitive-bid standard, and submit our own bid on equal footing. Whether we win the work or not, you get a defensible process — and one that holds up to NM Procurement Code scrutiny on public projects.
Tell us about the building and the roof problem. We'll document it and put a plan in writing — with an honest repair-vs-replace recommendation and no upsell pressure.
Get a roof assessment →